How reproducible is the synthesis of Zr–porphyrin metal–organic frameworks? An interlaboratory study

by Hanna L. B. Boström, Sebastian Emmerling, Fabian Heck, Charlotte Koschnick, Andrew J. Jones, Matthew J. Cliffe, Rawan Al Natour, Mickaële Bonneau, Vincent Guillerm, Osama Shekhah, Mohamed Eddaoudi, Javier Lopez-Cabrelles, Shuhei Furukawa, María Romero-Angel, Carlos Martí-Gastaldo, Minliang Yan, Amanda J. Morris, Ignacio Romero-Muñiz, Ying Xiong, Ana E. Platero-Prats, Jocelyn Roth, Wendy L. Queen, Kalle S. Mertin, Danielle E. Schier, Neil R. Champness, Hamish H.-M. Yeung, Bettina V. Lotsch
Year: 2023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202304832

Abstract

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are a rapidly growing class of materials that offer great promise in various applications. However, the synthesis remains challenging: for example, a range of crystal structures can often be accessed from the same building blocks, which complicates the phase selectivity. Likewise, the high sensitivity to slight changes in synthesis conditions may cause reproducibility issues. This is crucial, as it hampers the research and commercialization of affected MOFs. Here, it presents the first-ever interlaboratory study of the synthetic reproducibility of two Zr–porphyrin MOFs, PCN-222 and PCN-224, to investigate the scope of this problem. For PCN-222, only one sample out of ten was phase pure and of the correct symmetry, while for PCN-224, three are phase pure, although none of these show the spatial linker order characteristic of PCN-224. Instead, these samples resemble dPCN-224 (disordered PCN-224), which has recently been reported. The variability in thermal behavior, defect content, and surface area of the synthesised samples are also studied. The results have important ramifications for field of metal–organic frameworks and their crystallization, by highlighting the synthetic challenges associated with a multi-variable synthesis space and flat energy landscapes characteristic of MOFs.